This is leakage (leaking of marbles - if you think of thoughts as marbles, they seek to release deceptive marbles and contain the truthful incriminating ones, yet each time they open mouth and release marbles a few truthful ones will also leak out.
It's like a game of kerplunk where the sticks are the statements and the marbles are the truth which needs to be hidden, there comes a point when a stick is pulled and a few marbles fall out..
Each time they speak they release a few more marbles which in turn tell us the truth.
Kate has told us Maddie is dead, first when she talked about the Portuguese not wanting a murder in Portugal.
Kate tells of nightmare Daily Mirror
Lori Campbell In Praia Da Luz
'Breaking down in tears, distraught Kate said of the Portuguese police: "They want me to lie - I'm being framed.
"Police don't want a murder in Portugal and all the publicity about them not having paedophile laws here, so they're blaming us."'
Murder and not abduction kate?
This is a classic open mouth insert feet leakage of the truth.
She talks about a murder because this is what was on her mind during that statement using the process of free editing (the brains thinks the words a microsecobd before they are spoken or written)
She told us again Maddie was dead when she talked about pressing a button and they would ALL be togeather.
Mom: Madeleine Had "Sense Of Danger" CBS News
British Girl's Parents In Last Interview Before Being Named Suspects In Her Disappearance
Published: Oct. 5, 2007
Kate said, "It really isn't easy," coping. "Some days are better than others. ... There's days when you think, 'I can't do this anymore,' and you just want to press a button, and we're all gone, and it's all finished, and we're all together and gone. Wherever. But you can't, you know. Just occasionally you'll have a -- if you're having a really bad day, which we do. And you can't help but think that."
The keyword here is ALL.
The only way they could ALL be togeather after pressing a button (dead) is if she knows Maddie is dead, otherwise she just commited murder suicide on the remaining children, gerry and herself and made Maddie an orphan.
This is highly concerning and speaks volumes as to what she knows and her own involvement.
Why would an innocent parent of an abducted child talk openly about pressing buttons so they and their children could all be togeather?
They would, if anything, be more hyperprotective of their remaining children, trusting no one until their missing child is found and the perpetrator caught.
They don't know who abducted Maddie so would logically want them in their own care, perhaps not even trusting family members and friends with their care.
Instead we saw them dumping their remaining children in the club creche, despite claiming Maddie was abducted by a paedophile.
Why would they do that, given it could have been a member of staff in the creche or in the business that could have arranged for the abduction or committed the abduction?
Thinking logically, they would and could only do this if they knew their children were not at risk of harm from an abductor, which must mean they know who took Maddie which points to their own involvement in the disappearance and cover up or, one of the tapas group.
Since they have denied the tapas group involvement (if it was one of them, why would they protect them i would ask) then it can only mean the involvement of kate and gerry.
Gerry then told us he knew Maddie was dead when he told the world they played no part in Madeleine's death.
"I think the most important thing to say is that the evidence that's been presented by the PJ and the Prosecutor to the Judiciary and the judiciary, having reviewed all of the evidence, have said that there is no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there's no evidence to implicate us in her death and that's the message really which we fully expected to come out after the files were published and from our perspective, the most important thing is that Madeleine probably still is alive."
Given he keeps telling us they believe she is alive, why then does he then tell us she is dead by telling the world, there's no evidence to implicate us in her death.
Surely it should be in her DISAPPEARANCE?
Why do they insist there is no evidence Maddie is dead when there is plenty indicating such, the body fluids, the cadaverine, the mccanns reasons for why such evidence was found ( think about it. Why explain away evidence if there is no evidence?)
Why also do they always say they will never ever give up searching?
It gives them an infinite time and a presumption she will never be found or her alleged abductor caught.
Innocent parents will always presume their missing child will be found and the perpetrator caught.
It smacks of OJ simpson and his claims he would never stop searching for his ex wife's killer.Given they refuse to take polygraphs, imposing rules and requirements which would make it impossible, plus they only work if the polygrapher asks the right questions, the next and better option is statement analysis, where the interviewer learns the subjects personal, internal dictionary and uses only the words the subject introduces to learn the truth or the lie.
As an example a polygrapher could ask a paedophile if he molested little Tiffany and the paedophile says no and passes.
This would be because the paedophile didn't think of it as molestation but rather hugging, tickling or cuddling.
A statement analyst woul seek to learn what the paedophile thinks and thus what he did, by asking did you touch little Tiffany?
where did you touch her?
Did you touch her over her clothes?
Did you touch her under her clothes?
What did you touch her with?
How did you touch her? and so on so what he did is learned.
The mccanns and their chums all need to be reinterviewed under caution, in kate's case the 48 questions asked and explanations sought for why she never searched, why cadaverine etc was found on her clothes etc
Gerry needs to be asked about the cadaverine and blood found in the apt. and hire car.
Both need to be asked why they told the world Maddie is dead ( see above)
All need to do a full reconstruction and if they refuse then charges of homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report need to be pressed upon them.
Murder convictions don't need to rely on a body.
The tapas chums need to be charged with obstruction of justice and perverting the course of justice and ditto for clarrie.
Deals may be possible if the tapas group tell the truth (immunity or reduced sentence)
A deal may even be possible for the mccanns depending on the circumstances (mental health issues such as PND or other mental health issues perhaps)
If it is true that gerry has a prior conviction then no deal should be offered unless he tells exactly what happened and where Maddie was dumped, and her remains found.