What Is Done Cannot Be Undone

From an article in the daily mail.



Amy Elizabeth Fleming (pictured), 60,
A 60-year-old Florida woman has been has been charged with the murder of her young son, Francillon Pierre.

Amy Elizabeth Fleming was arrested last month for allegedly killing her son, Francillon Pierre, when he was just three years old in 1986. 

According to The Charley Project, Francillon was last seen at the Broad Acres Swap Meet in North Las Vegas, Nevada, on August 2, 1986.

At the time of his disappearance, the child had been living with his mother, who was known as Amy Luster, and his stepfather, Lee Luster.
His biological father's name is Jean Pierre, Amy's former boyfriend.
The year before Francillon disappeared, Amy and Lee Luster were charged with child abuse.
They had allegedly beat Francillon so bad that they caused 30 to 40 welts to form on his body.
The Lusters were awaiting trial when the little boy went missing, according to the Project.
At the time, the couple told police they believed the boy's father, Jean Pierre, took the child back to Haiti.








Francillon (left) was last seen at the Broad Acres Swap Meet in North Las Vegas, Nevada, on August 2, 1986. Francillon's age-progression photo is seen above

They had also claimed that they had taken Francillon to the swap meet and lost him there.
Authorities later searched Pierre's home in Haiti, but found no trace of Francillon.
Pierre was then asked to fly to the US to take a lie detector test, which he passed.
He was eventually ruled out as a suspect.

They had also claimed that they had taken Francillon to the swap meet and lost him there.
Authorities later searched Pierre's home in Haiti, but found no trace of Francillon.
Pierre was then asked to fly to the US to take a lie detector test, which he passed. He was eventually ruled out as a suspect.

Almost a year after Francillon's disappearance, Amy and Lee Luster moved to Florida, telling police that they still believed Pierre had taken the child and wanted to be closer to Haiti.
The Nevada Department of Probation and Parole gave them a 30-day travel pass to find work and a home in Orlando or else return to Nevada.
Amy and Lee were considered suspects in the case but they were never charged, until December 2018.

Enlarge this image




It's unclear how investigators were able to break the case. But the North Las Vegas police will be releasing more details about what led to Amy Fleming's arrest during a news conference on Monday. Police said detectives have spent more than a year working Francillon's case

A warrant for Amy's arrest was issued on December 13. A month later, she was booked into the Palm Beach County Jail for allegedly murdering her son, according to The Columbus Dispatch.
Her second court appearance is scheduled for Monday.    
It's unclear how investigators were able to break the case. 
But the North Las Vegas police will be releasing more details about what led to Amy Fleming's arrest during an afternoon news conference on Monday.
Police said detectives have spent more than a year working the case. 
Read more:

• Francillon Pierre – The Charley Project
• www.dispatch.com...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6688263/Mother-60-charged-murdering-three-year-old-son-three-decades-ago.html


There we have it, or rather, should i say, there you kate and gerry have it.

30 years down the line and she has been charged with murder.

30 years kate and gerry.

Read it again, THIRTY YEARS.

You have struggled from the get go to come up with a plausible explanation as to what happened to Maddie.
An abduction by a paedophile abductor to explain why she was missing.

A jolly good wheeze you thought, plausible and you thought it would be believed.

You came up with the plan that you were leaving the children home alone at night and doing half hourly checks on them, everyone was taking turns, well those that were allegedly present each night, checking their own children and occasionally yours, whilst you being the selfish folk that you are, claimed you were checking your children every half hour and NOT CHECKING ANYONE ELSE'S CHILDREN.
I suppose this epitomizes your narcissistic selfishness.
You had to admit to 'child neglect', leaving the children home alone in order to allow time and opportunity for an abduction to take place.
You had to admit to alleged child neglect with all the risks that entailed such as being charged and facing years in prison.

As i repeatedly say:

NO NEGLECT = NO ABDUCTION
NO ABDUCTION = DAMNING QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT YOU, KATE AND GERRY, DID TO MADDIE.Had you been charged with child neglect resulting in harm it would have gone as follows.
Your lawyers knowing the law would have advised you as to what the possible penalties were in relation to the charges of homicide, concealment  of a corpse and filing a false police report.
You would also have been told they could not charge you with neglect and then later be charged with homicide, concealment  of a corpse and filing a false police report.
Knowing this you go to court and take the stand.
When you  are presented with the charge of child neglect resulting in harm IE. Maddie being abducted, you can then say the children were not neglected.
The children were not left home alone each night, they were being babysat by the missing adult from the group each night all in the same apartment.
There was no neglect and the case is closed after the prosecution drop their case and you walk free.
Granted your reputations are in tatters and you would likely lose your jobs or be  severely censored by the GMC for bring the profession into disrepute.
You lose friends and possibly family and possibly the fund.
Your excuse for claiming what you did was that Maddie did indeed die of an accident, perhaps after accidentally swallowing some of your pills, died during her sleep and you panicked.
You had to claim neglect to allow for the non existent abductor to commit his non existent crime.

We all know that the children were never left home alone as claimed.

Claiming you didn't want to use the evening creche or babysitters because you didn't want strangers looking after your children whilst also leaving said children in the care of strangers each day in the creche makes absolutely no sense.
The very same creche whose staff would have been providing the evening creche and also allowing the creche staff to be hired out for €10 a night.
You would have known this.

Anyone who works in medicines doctors, nurses being the most obvious are all too aware of what can happen in a fraction of a second to a child even with the parent next to them.
This knowledge alone makes medical parents hypervilgilant when it comes to their children.
They simply would not have left their children home alone, ever.
More so, given we know they had sick children and sick adults due to some tummy bug (allegedly)
We know that each night one of the group was missing from the table for dinner either because they were sick or because a child was sick.
We know this missing adult was in fact babysitting all the children in one apartment.

How do we know?

Because you, kate and gerry told us when you spoke using the process of free editing and leaked this when you spoke of what happened the night before, the Wednesday when Maddie allegedly  asked why they hadn't come when  she/ the twins/ combination of depending on which interview were crying.
Your response when speaking about the alleged crying incident was and i quote from an interview broadcast: 01 May 2008:

 Gerry McCann: Anybody with young children will understand that children cry; they wake up at night.
During that week there was one night, errr… and we can't give too much detail because it's part of the investigation file but there was one night where Madeleine came through and one of the other, errr… twins were crying, so, you know, and when she did mention to it… it to us and we asked her about it and she just dropped… she was completely fine and we thought,
'Was it when they were bathing, getting them, you know, first putting them down in that period when they're really tired.
Of course, with hindsight, in the… in the context of what had happened; of Madeleine being abducted, it's put in a very different light and it's put in a very different light to us and, of course, we emphasized that to the police."

Firstly note  he speaks about getting them ready for bed and he says this:

"Was it when they were bathing, getting them, you know, first putting them down in that period when they're really tired."
This is a man who claims he and kate left the children home alone in apartment 5a and then he and kate left the apartment  went to dinner in the tapas bar and did half hourly checks.
The problem here is, if he and kate were doing the bedtime routine, the bathing and putting to bed, then the question would never have arisen because kate and gerry were there, would have heard the crying and presumably although with their parenting, possibly not, and responded to soothe the children.
Had he or kate been putting them to bed the question would never have arisen as they would have been present when the children were crying, for whatever reason.
So, as we hear from gerry, they did not hear any crying nor did they respond, the questions then become:

Who was bathing the children if it wasn't kate and gerry?

 Why was someone else bathing the children when kate and gerry were allegedly present in the apartment, perhaps getting ready for dinner, remember kate's 2 baths/showers once before payne allegedly showed up to see if kate needed help and later once gerry came back from tennis, she bathed and they had a bottle of NZ wine?

Why would kate need to bathe again after a man visited her, especially with the large disparity in the length of time he stayed and where he stood in the apartment?

Since kate and gerry did not hear the alleged crying, nor respond to said alleged crying if they were all in the same place, where were the children being bathed?

If the children were, as claimed, in apartment 5a being bathed and put to bed, where were kate and gerry?

 Why were kate and gerry getting ready in a different apartment from where their children were if the immediate above applied?

 We know all the children were being babysat by the missing (allegedly sick) adult, it is highly unlikely they would all be in their own apartments so, in whose apartment were all the children sleeping until their parents collected them late at night?

I would think they would all be in the biggest apartment which would be paynes, it would also fit in with the statements from the Drs Gaspar regarding payne and gerry having an inappropriate discussion , with gestures, about what Maddie would do.

Next we have confirmation that all the children were sleeping in the same apartment/room.
Gerry leaks this:

Madeleine came through and one of the other, errr… twins were crying"

Did you spot it?

Gerry was about to say one of the other children, thus telling us all the children were in one apartment, before self censoring, stopping himself and saying other twins.
Too late gerry, you said one word too many.
There were no OTHER TWINS gerry only yours, Sean and Amelie.
Oops

This means the tapas 7 are complicit in whatever happened, although diane webster may have been kept in the dark since she was the mother to fiona payne and granny to her kids and perhaps not as trusted or reliable as the rest of the group, not a part of whatever shenanigans the group were up to.

The tapas are complicit since they covered up the fact the children were babysat by the missing adult.

We know Maddie died before the Thursday night when she was allegedly abducted because the dining routines changed.

Instead of all eating at the Millennium  for breakfast as it was included, the mccanns had breakfast Sunday morning and then ate breakfast in their own apartment.

We also know that instead of everyone eating lunch in one of the apartments as planned, the mccanns ate lunch in their own apartment only meeting up with everyone in the tapas bar for dinner.

WHY?
Anyone would think they were trying to hide something, to avoid awkward questions, probably from diane webster as to where Maddie was ?

We also have the almost forensically cleaned apartment that did not look as if children were present.
Children are sticky, drooly, messy creatures and their sticky fingerprints, saliva, urine possibly even faeces would have been everywhere especially bedroom, and the place should have been covered with their DNA especially bedding yet little to none was found.

Police look for WHAT IS THERE THAT SHOULDN'T BE and also WHAT SHOULD BE THAT ISN'T.
In effect, Maddie had been erased from the apartment.
Her bed which she had allegedly slept in was made up whereas the bed under the window where she wasn't sleeping looked slept in as it was messy, just like a nearly 4 year old would leave it.

Why though did the mccanns insist that Maddie was in the bed by the door that was almost perfectly made, even to the turned back corner rather than the bed that looked as if it had been slept in under the window?
They apparently shared a toothbrush was another excuse for no DNA.
There wasn't even clothing which would have carried Maddie's scent especially the clothing that she would have allegedly been wearing on the Thursday she was allegedly abducted.
Gerry had to return to rothley towers in order to get something with her DNA on!

What was also missing then and has been for the last almost 12 years is forensic evidence of an abductor, finger prints, shoe or foot prints, hairs, fibers, sweat, perhaps even semen or other bodily fluids.

Instead, the forensic evidence which had been found which should not have been present, is blood and bodily fluids in the apartment and hire car and the scent of cadaverine as indicated by the dogs Eddie and Keela.
Evidence which was explained away eventually as Maddie may have had a nose bleed, rotting meat and fish, dirty diapers and sweaty sandals with gerry even citing the case of eugene zapata when his wife went missing and cadaver dogs were brought in and indicated to some locations. the judge declaring them as unreliable as no body was found.

This backfired on him spectacularly when zapata later confessed to killing his wife and the dogs had been right.

 https://www.twincities.com/2008/03/11/man-says-he-would-have-admitted-killing-wifeafter-his-death/

 We also had explanations as to why body fluids and cadaverine had been found as kate dealing with multiple corpses before the trip (from her family) and to it being planted in order to frame her which by default acknowledged Maddie was dead
The latter meaning that someone had had access to Maddie's remains and taken material from said remains ,planted it in order to frame the mccanns.

This then begs the questions as to what were the mccanns involved in that meant they would/could be framed for homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report?

It also begs the questions as to why Maddie's remains could not have been 'found' by someone reporting it anonymously or placing it in a location where it would be found.?

Remember kate had that 'dream' whilst gerry was away in America and called Police Inspector Ricardo Paiva crying,to say she had a 'dream' that Maddie was on a hill and they should search there.

Kate's Dream About Maddie On A Hill

This came out in the trial where they were suing Dr. Goncalo Amaral and trying to get his book banned and damages awarded to them and their children

Insp Paiva told the hearing in Lisbon: “Kate called me, she was alone as Gerry was away and she was crying.

“She said she had dreamt that Madeleine was on a hill and that we should search for her there.
She gave the impression that she thought she was dead – it was a turning point for us.”
The senior detective said the land was searched but nothing was found. “That is when we decided to send the specialist dogs in. British police informed us about how they could detect the scent of death.”

When  gerry heard about kate calling the police and telling them she dreamed Maddie was on a hill, he was not impressed.
His reaction and response was almost comical

"I would like to make absolutely clear that Kate has never had a dream, that Madeleine was buried somewhere. And, I don't know if something has been lost in interpretation, but that didn't happen."

Gerry Denies Kate Had Dream About Maddie On A Hill

I bet that was fun when gerry found out what kate had said to the Portuguese police.

That the mccanns proffered the various possible explanations for what was found meant they knew Maddie was dead and, as innocent parents , they would have been screaming the place down, inconsolable and demanding the police find who did this to their daughter and also be out searching for her remains.
Since they didn't it means they already knew their daughter was dead.

To allow for time to dispose of Maddie after her death and to allow time for the clean up and also figuring out a story, Maddie could not have died Thursday evening.
There simply would not have been time for the cleanup and working out timelines and also for everyone to be at the table that night unlike the rest of the week.

They did the checks that Thursday night as it would have meant leaving the children home alone.

We also know Maddie did not die from an accidental death as gerry himself told us:

"And if she died when we were in the apartment, or fell, why would we cover that up?"

And if she died when we were in the apartment, or fell, why would we cover that up?

Oops

Since they did cover it up, by their language and behavior it was not an accident.

Kate went even further, confirming Maddie's death was non accidental when she said:

 09/09/2007
Daily Mirror Interview.
Quote:
 "They want me to lie - I'm being framed.
Police don't want a MURDER in Portugal and all the publicity about them not having paedophile laws here, so they're blaming US"

I'm Being Framed, Police Don't Want A Murder In Portugal
Sadly the original  article in the Sunday Mirror was whoosh clucked.

Why say murder when the story is abduction and that Maddie is still alive?
Oops.

Then we have the Portuguese Supreme court pronouncing the mccanns had not been cleared of involvement when the mccanns sued Dr Amaral over his book, winning the initial court case and then losing every subsequent appeal.
Page 70 contains the relevant bit of the verdict

Portuguese Supreme Court Judgement Against The mccanns
The mccanns are currently appealing to the ECHR.

The problem they have also is that the Supreme Court cited the ECHR in its verdict.
Initially it was claimed they were targeting Dr. Goncalo Amaral until they finally got the message that they could not  sue an individual, they could only bring a case against a state or government.
They were trying to stop having to pay anything towards Dr. Goncalo Amaral, costs etc.
A basic look at what can and cannot be done at the ECHR showed that
the Court cannot quash, rehear or revise decisions taken by domestic courts.The mccanns would have to pay what they owed.

As a  result and presumably someone with legal knowledge got their attention, they then claimed they were in fact taking Portugal to court and that the paperwork had allegedly been filed.
Nothing is showing for the mccanns currently nor will it likely ever be since very few applications make the grade and are heard.

It can also take several years to progress through the system.

Those who fail at whichever hurdle, usually the first are not told why.

ECHR Questions and Answers

Unsolved cases do not get closed, they become cold cases and over the years they will be reopened and looked at by fresh eyes and where applicable using new advances in forensic technology.
What could not be seen or examined 10 years ago is now seen clearly.

A murder does not advance for it cannot, It is frozen in time at the moment the murder was committed.

A murder cannot be undone, the murdered cannot become live again.
Forensic science  advances, it is forever moving forward, growing,almost  living.

You, kate and gerry, also have the problem of wondering if you can trust your friends, your accomplices to stay quiet.
Are the pangs of guilt eating away at them they way they are at you kate?
Is whatever hold gerry has over the tapas 7 still strong enough to keep them silent?
What about the twins?
Can you trust them to stay silent regarding what they have seen, heard or remembered since that vacation?

A secret is not a secret if more than one person knows?

Could tomorrow be the day the walls come crashing down?
Could you last 30 years  or more concealing the death of Maddie?
Do you think the tapas 7, your  now very distant friends, if friends at all could last 30 years?
What happens if divorce rears its head and a custody battle ensues, guilty knowledge can be a mighty fearsome weapon to use?

Thirty years kate and gerry and justice for this little boy.
30 years kate and gerry.

Look at this kate and gerry.

30 years = 10,950 Days30 years = 262,800 Hours
30 years = 15,768,000 Minutes
30 years = 946,080,000 Seconds

Tick
Tock
Tick
Tock

Slowly counting the time, inevitable, unchangeable, never ending, constant.
Your finite life slowly being counted down, inexorably to zero.
Imagine spending your dotage in jail.
It is bad enough now that everything you worked for kate is down the pan.
How many years was that?
It is bad enough that gerry is stuck lecturing with the risk he may not get tenure in  classes where his students hate him after being stuck in a dead end job in a hospital doing a back room job  where the staff loathed him.
It is bad enough that your reputations are non existent, your friends are few, your supporters have disappeared over the horizon and you are adrift and lonely, wondering what those you do know are saying behind your backs?
Imagine your physical body in a physical jail in Portugal for however many years when perhaps if you had been truthful from the start you would have some semblance of a life when you got out then there is the problem of the fund and for that you will be prosecuted in the UK.
Should you be released from Portuguese prison  to then end up in a UK prison, again had you been truthful from the get go you could have had some semblance of a life when you got out, perhaps even starting over but not in the jobs you both studied and trained so hard for.
It would have all been over and done with, instead of it all being behind you and letting you move on, it is now all ahead of you, waiting, watching, the moment will arrive all too soon and it will be too late for you to do a deal, to beg forgiveness, not from us, rather from your surviving children, whom you lied to from the get go, whose innocence was ripped away by you for your own selfish needs, who may even need therapy to come to terms with what you did to their sister and to them.
Then there is the mental prison you are already in.


Almost 12 years of hell wondering if today is the day the police come knocking at your door, wondering if your probably now ex chums have had a word with the Police or even if the twins, who will have read everything about the case and their missing sister and your non searching and non cooperation decide to have a word with the Police to say what they remember, saw or heard over the last 12 years.
Your friends in high places are no longer in power or high places and your rich financial backers have withdrawn their finances and distanced themselves from you.

Heck even the Vatican removed Maddie from their website.
You can be sure the Vatican's investigators would have done some investigating of their own when they found out what you did and didn't do in relation to your daughter.
I bet that hurt, given your statement that Rome was preparing itself for you as per your diary"Clarence spoke to us about a possible visit to the Vatican. Rome is already preparing itself. Francis Campbell was spoken to" – Kate McCanns' diary, 27th of May, as reported in Correio da Manhã 26 July 2007

The Pope was effectively turning his back and his support on you.
Until you confess the truth, you are in an inescapable prison of your own making.
You struggled the first few days and weeks and escaped by the skin of your teeth once you were made arguido.
Since then things have not gone in your favor, money is running out, you are loathed by all but a few supporters who for whatever reason and against all the evidence, think you are innocent.
Just how long can you last?
How long can you take that little worm of guilt hiding in your brain eating away at you?
How long can you hope that none of the tapas 7 turn against you?
How long can you last wondering if your other half isn't going to throw you under the bus?
How long can you take the knowing looks, the whispered remarks before you crack?
How long can you continue to lie to your children, knowing they have and will continue to search the internet for news, stories, information, the translated PJ files?

TICK TOCK