Sunday, April 1, 2018

Yet More Funding for Operation Grange!

What are they investigating?

After 11 years there is still not one iota of evidence that Maddie was abducted by a stranger or family or tapas member.
If there had been then it would have been spread all over the media.
What is missing is them stating that the final line of enquiry involves forensic evidence showing abduction.
Come to think of it, what is missing is mention of any enquiry involving forensic evidence which is strange given all the forensic evidence which exists.

Given the crime occurred in Portugal, what are the UK police investigating since any prosecution would be in Portugal by Portuguese prosecutors.

Could the UK police be investigating the one thing they can prosecute which is the fund?
Financial investigations can take time.

meanwhile no matter how much money they throw at Operation Grange, until they haul the mccanns, the tapas 7 and even clarrie in for interviews preferably all at the exact same time and all in separate police stations then they will get nowhere.
What criminal investigation especially in the case of a missing child where homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report are the minimum charges being faced does not interview the parents and those who had access to the missing child at the time of the alleged disappearance?

Statistics alone show most homicides of children are committed by parents/guardians or someone known to the family.
In cases where abduction is claimed the vast majority is where a parent/guardian has faked an abduction to conceal a homicide of a child or abduction is by a non custodial parent.

Claims that there is no evidence that Maddie has come to serious harm is refuted by the forensic evidence of body fluids and blood in the apartment and hire car and also by the reactions of trained blood and cadaver dogs in the apartment, hire car and on  a pair of kate's checked pants, a child's red t shirt and the infamous cuddle cat.

Given also the claim by the mccanns that she was abducted by a paedophile, i would question what their definition of serious harm is if  repeated rape and sexual abuse does not constitute serious harm.
If Maddie was a victim of sexual abuse at home or at the hands of others prior to or during said vacation, does this mean that they do not consider it serious harm as no parent would deliberately want to seriously harm their child.

This is something i would ask them about.

It would also explain the distancing language in relation to Maddie by her parents  prior to her death, for she is long dead and subsequent when they refer to her as child, girl or even getting her name wrong completely.
it would also explain their behavior, there was no emotional bond with Maddie with kate positively blooming after Maddie was gone.

Operation Grange can only be taken seriously as a criminal investigation if the follow SOP and arrest and interview the mccanns, the tapas 7 and clarrie under caution.
I include clarrie since he has leaked so much including that Maddie is dead and he knows it.

I personally would also interview the extended families of kate and gerry to learn their relationship emotionally with Maddie, what they know regarding the initial calls that Thursday night and what they learned during their time in PDL.
I would also ask about their relationships with the mccanns today, if they have heard anything that gives them pause, if they know anything which could be of use to the investigation, with a healthy reminder that failing to cooperate will be considered obstruction of justice or perverting the course of justice.

Until  everyone is arrested under caution, the UK investigation will simply tread water and gain nothing for the millions spent.
Operation grange needs to grow a pair and do some actual policing.

Those who seek to conceal and block the investigation will always be found out, history will do that and woe betide those who are still alive when the truth comes out as it will.
Someone will speak, the guilt will eat away.
A secret is not a secret if more than one person knows.

In the meantime we do not know what the PJ know nor do we know what or who they are investigating.
There is no time limit on the crime of murder, remember it was kate who told us the Portuguese don't want a murder.

"They want me to lie - I'm being framed.
"Police don't want a murder in Portugal and all the publicity about them not having paedophile laws here, so they're blaming us."'

Note also kate uses the pronoun I'm in relation to being framed but uses the pronoun we in relation to publicity about paedophile laws.

Why would she use the first person singular in relation to being framed when both her and gerry were suspects?
Who was doing the alleged framing?
WE shows shared unity and cooperation.

Was kate leaking responsibility?
What was she being framed for?
She links the framing  with the crime of murder.
She is admitting then that there is evidence forensic and otherwise that would indicate a death, a murder.
Something that could not be explained away as accidental.
This would preclude something like accidental overdose, Maddie finding pills and eating them thinking they were candy.
Does this mean there were physical injuries that could not be explained away as accidental?
Old injuries or scars?
Healing injuries that perhaps would have required hospital treatment?
Fresh injuries that were clearly non accidental?
Signs perhaps of medical intervention such as CPR which often breaks ribs (it is not nice and easy as per the movies, CPR is brutal) or maybe a tracheotomy or something else?

Did Maddie die of something so bad that it could not be explained away and an autopsy must be prevented at all costs?

Only by interviewing everyone under caution with frequent reminders of the penalties for no cooperation, obstruction of justice, perverting the course of justice, aiding and abetting an offender, homicide, concealment of a corpse, filing a false police report, perjury and anything else they can think of before they start introducing things regarding the fund such as fraud, obtaining money and services by deception, wire fraud etc.

As it stands, UK policing is a laughing stock as even the most inept police forces at least would interview the parents and those who had access to the missing child as a start.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post a comment