Why do we continue?
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed.
Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.
She is very young and vulnerable and needs our help.
We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.
Firstly: Who are they asking the question of?
Are they asking themselves why they continue?
Why would they even need to aak this question of themselves?
If they were innocent then they would continue searching till they find her or till they die, it is a natural instinct, one that does not need to be questioned.
Are they asking us?
That they are asking it makes it sensitive to them.Is the sensitivity due to guilt or something else?
Guilt would be the main reason since why would a guilty person search for their victim when instinct would be to distance themselves from the dump area.
The exception being those who want to make sure nothing has been disturbed either by weather or predation or other environmental concerns, another would be to gloat, to relieve the crime perhaps even to commit further abuse.
Other to dump their next victim.
Some perhaps even to apologise or celebrate a life event such as the killers of Kiesha Abrahams who went to her dump site to wish her a happy birthday.
The killers were her mom and stepdad.
It it perhaps sensitivity due to them not having physically searched as per kate mccann's interview.
Thier subsequent refusal to take part in police reconstructions or fully co-operate with the PJ or, in kate's case, the refusal to answer the 48 questions despite admitting on question 49 when told by not answering the questions she was hindering the investigation, to which she replied "Yes, if that's what the investigation thinks"
There is also the sensitivity about the fund.
Is the only reason they are continuing is so they can continue to get donations and live the lifestyle to which they would like to become accustomed?
If they discontinue then the fund comes to an end.
No more donations.
No donations and a bucketload of legal fees to pay off means pauperville in their eyes
Secondly: Absolutely is a qualifier, a word that when removed, doesn't change the meaning of the sentence.
Here they claim there is absolutely nothing to suggest Madeleine has been harmed.
is a blatant lie since Maddie is still missing plus we have the reaction of the cadaver dogs in the
apartment and hire and to items of clothing and cuddlecat.
We also have the presence of blood and body fluids in the apartment as well as her DNA in the hire car.
Blood which would cause an innocent parent to fear their child was injured.
fluids which would also cause an innocent parent to not only fear their
child had been injured but would also cause them the terror of
wondering if their child had been killed and if they had suffered.
we have them coming up with implausible explanations for why blood and
body fluids and DNA were found from nosebleeds, to sweaty sandals,
rotting meat, fish, dirty diapers and kate dealing with several corpses
before the vacation.
Madeleine was harmed simply by being removed from her family. they claim absolutely no evidence of harm despite acknowledging the
blood and body fluids and DNA in the hire car by coming up with
WE have kate relaxing when she saw the dogs reacting and telling us it was junk science.
This is unexpected.
The expected from an innocent parent would be to ask what it meant?
Did it mean their child had been hurt?
Did it mean their child was dead?
It would cause hysteria as the innocent parents confronts their worst fears.
Instead we have kate ignoring the reactions and responses and thus the implications.
Why would she do this?
Is it because she knows what happened to Maddie and seeks to minimise and ignore the reactions of the dogs?
This is the behavior of the guilty or those with guilty knowledge.
Demean and pour scorn on the investigators and the investigation.
Thirdly: We then have them telling us SOMEONE needs to be looking for her.
This is telling in that they they don't say they (WE) need to be looking for her.
The onus is not on the parents to keep looking instead it is on the wider world to look.
Someone needs excludes themselves which is unexpected.
Why would they not need to be looking for their daughter?
Is it because they know where she is and thus they do not need to look?
Is it because looking for her would result in consequences to them?
If she were found dead and they were innocent, there would be no
consequences to them, they would be able to give her a dignified burial and be allowed to grieve.
If however she were found dead and they were guilty, then there would be consequences.
it would explain their passivity and non urgency in relation to searching.
It would also explain their non co-operation and rampant litigation.
finding of Maddie brings consequences to the mccanns and probably the
tapas 7 as well, along with clarrie for perverting the course of
justice and obstruction at a minimum.
They could also possibly faces charges of accessories after the fact.
Fourthly: They tell us she is young and vulnerable and needs their help.
Yet they have done everything in their power not to help.
They refused to cooperate with the police.
Refused to answer 48 questions - kate
to take part in a police reconstruction via the tapas 7 setting so many
demands and restrictions it was not possible for it to take place.
Ran back to the UK as soon as they were made arguidos and promptly hired high class and expensive extradition lawyers.
Sued or threatened to sue anyone who didn't agree with their version of events.
If that is them helping, i would hate to see what their hindering would be like.
Finally We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.
Actions speak stronger than words.
If they love and miss her so much, why have they done everything they can to hinder and obstruct the investigation?
If they love her and miss her so much, can we expect them to answer all questions asked of them including the 48 kate refused to answer despite admitting by not answering it hindered the search?
Can we expect them and all the tapas 7 group to take part in a police reconstruction?
Can we expect them to cooperate unreservedely with the PJ and Scotland Yard?
Can we expect to actually physically search for their daughter?
Can we expect them to use the fund to put up a reward for the recovery of Maddie dead or alive and/or the arrest and prosecution of those involved in her murder, disposal of her remains and subsequent cover up?
Currently i do not think there is any reward since the NOTW went bosoms up and they provided £250,000 of it with the rest of the £2.5 million coming from Richard Branson, Steven Winyard, Sir Philip Green and Everton FC owner Bill Kenwright.
It was also reported that the NOTW gave the money from the reward to the fund in April 2011
From a press officer
Thank you for your enquiry.
I can confirm
that the funds raised by the appeal were donated in April this year
(2011) to the official Madeleine Fund and the fund created by News of
the World is no longer active.
Since the reward was donated to the fund, why has the fund not used said money to offer a reward?
Is it because the fund is instead being used to pay all their legal fees and also possible fines and compensation from their failed lawsuits?