Who Needs Enemies When You Have clarence mitchell On Your Side?

On 11 April 2008, Clarence Mitchell made this bold claim: “Kate and Gerry have been utterly honest and utterly open with the police and all of their statements from the moment that Madeleine was taken”. He later said, referring to himself and the McCanns: ‘We have nothing to hide’. When addressing a largely student audience during what were called ‘The Coventry Conversations’, Mitchell said: “We are always willing to co-operate with the Portuguese police”“Kate and Gerry have been utterly honest and utterly open with the police and all of their statements from the moment that Madeleine was taken
Qualifiers are words which, when removed do not change the meaning of the sentence. here we have the qualifier UTTERLY which weakens the statement, it is repeated twice further weakening the statement and making their honesty and openness with the police highly sensitive.

Mitchell said: “We are always willing to co-operate with the Portuguese police”. 
Qualifiers are words which, when removed do not change the meaning of the sentence. 
Here he uses the qualifier ALWAYS as well as using the future conditional WILLING.
He doesn't tell us the mccanns are cooperating with the police, only that they are willing.
This willingness is weakened by the qualifier ALWAYS.

Anyone can be always willing to do something, it doesn't mean they will, it depends on the circumstances.
I may be willing to swim the channel, it doesn't mean i will or can.
It would depend on how fit i am , the weather, the cost, support etc.
Why does he include himself in relation to cooperating with the police?
Has he himself been questioned in regard to what he knows regarding Maddie?
As their spokesman, he would be privy to a lot of stuff the mccanns don't want the public and especially the police to know. 
What they would be willing to do to cooperate with the police would be based on them not incriminating themselves, guilty knowledge or consequences to themselves and possibly others such as their children.

Given that we know they have been anything but open and honest with the police, kate not answering the 48 questions, them not doing the reconstruction despite being legally obliged to as arguidos, by getting their tapas chums to set so many demands and requirements as to make it impossible to do and thus they don't have to do it.
They lied about the checks, the neglect( the children were all in one apartment being watched by which ever adult who was allegedly sick, they withheld their medical and financial records, hired lawyers first thing and did everything they could to obfuscate, derail and generally stop the investigation in its tracks, even to suing the lead detective (now retired) when he told the world Maddie was dead and they were involved , this is despite both kate and gerry telling the world the same thing.

When they are arrested and charges are laid against them and the tapas 7 , will we see clarrie in the dock as well charged with obstruction and perverting the course of justice?

Every time they, clarrie or their tapas chums or family members open their mouths, more of the truth is leaked out., for which i and many other statement analysts and forensic linguists are eternally grateful.