Pages

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Message From The mccans On Their Official Site

Official Find Madeleine Campaign

Why do we continue?
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed.
Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.
She is young and vulnerable and needs our help.
We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.

We still need your help in finding Madeleine. Thank you for continuing to stand by our side and most of all, for caring so much about Madeleine.

~FM Webmaster


Another open mouth insert feet moment brought to you by the mccanns's, the parents who just keep giving.

Why do we continue?
 
Who is the questioned aimed at?
The public or, themselves?



 

There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. 

On first reading it sounds like a strong statement.however, it isn't.
Qualifiers are words that when removed do not change the meaning of the sentence.


Here we have the addition of the word
absolutely which weakens the statement.
A strong statement would be: There is no evidence to suggest Madeleine has been harmed.
Qualifiers weaken the meaning of the sentence.


We know the statement is untrue since we have the reactions of both blood and cadaver dogs, we have body fluids and we also have the fact that Maddie is missing.
What we don't have is evidence of an abduction such as finger, ear or footprints, skin or hair or fibres, DNA from someone unknown to the group.

If a Missing child isn't evidence of harm, then what is their definition of harm?
There is evidence that Maddie has come to harm, unfortunately said evidence indicates a dead Maddie not an abducted live Maddie.


 

Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her. 
Notice they say someone needs to be looking for her and not the expected WE need to be looking for her or the stronger yet WE ARE STILL LOOKING FOR HER. 
Clearly the someone doesn't include her family, the tapas 7 or their friends in general.
Why the need to distance themselves from looking for their child?
This is unexpected in innocent parents and a red flag.

 


She is young and vulnerable and needs our help. 

Yes she is but apparently our help doesn't include her parents actively searching for her from the moment she went missing.

 

We love her dearly and miss her beyond words. 

Not dearly enough to actually go out actively searching for her from the get go.
Not dearly enough for kate to answer the 48 questions.
Not dearly enough to go back and do a police reconstruction then or now.
Not dearly enough to assist the police rather than suing the ex lead detective who actively searched for her and spent many hours, days and weeks trying to find her or those who harmed her.
They love her dearly for the money she brought in.

 


We still need your help in finding Madeleine.  

Why?

When you had the chance to keep the case open you refused to demand it be kept open.


You hired people who were skilled in money laundering and who were involved in drugs.


You hired con artists and bumbling ex coppers who had no idea how to run a basic missing persons case.

You hired anyone except those who were expert in finding missing persons.


You have never looked for your daughter, instead preferring to sit round the pool making merry or going jogging or on world trips, visiting places where Maddie was not sighted and ignoring those possible places where she might have been.


You sat on e-fits for several years because the e-fits looked just like gerry.


You spent only a tiny proportion of the funds on actual searching , with the vast majority going on the mortgage, legal fees (really? If you are innocent why the need for lawyers?) travelling round the world and suing anyone who disagreed with your version of events.


What you should have said is
:

 "WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP TO KEEP US IN THE STYLE TO WHICH WE HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED" 


Thank you for continuing to stand by our side and most of all, for caring so much about Madeleine. In statement analysis, order is important.
It tells us what the subject considers as their priority.

Here we have their priority as us standing by their side supporting them followed by caring so much about Madeleine.
They tell us most of all for caring about Madeleine, yet, put caring about her behind standing by the mccanns side.

What is missing from all their statements  and press releases are messages to Maddie telling them we are searching for her and to be brave and strong, we will find her.

Instead all the talk is about them, how they feel, how victimised they feel when pulled up on the language and behavior.


It is all about them rather than about their daughter.

They don't talk to Maddie or reassure her they will find and rescue her because they know she is dead.


They themselves have told us she is long dead.


They don't talk to her because they know she will never see or hear or read it.


Corpses are beyond the reach of communication.

7 comments:

  1. Sterling, Hobs = bravo.
    Ch√Ętelaine

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant post Hobs - Totally agree.
    I do wish the press would mention the official police files more often then jo public will be more encouraged to discover the truth; instead the narrow sighted parasitic followers believe the wishy washy thoughtless ramblings the McCs

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent post as always Hobs
    Beanie

    ReplyDelete
  4. These 2 are craftier than Hindley&BradyThe evil ba£tards!! Great post Hobs!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh yes, and that's an emphatic yes. Unlike, as can be heard at 1m36s, an emphatic no.
    "Did you kill your daughter?" - "No, that's an emphatic no." said Gerry McCann, the guilt and the lies oozing from every pore in his body. http://bit.ly/1nsNDIb

    As for the rest of it? Well I wouldn't want to spam your blog, so perhaps I might, if I may, leave you only, the ubiquitous straw man. http://twitpic.com/92dxxw

    Good man.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting as always Hobbs.

    I wonder however if 'someone needs to be looking for her' is a sly dig at the police? We, and they, know that the police are looking for a body, they are not looking for a live child. She (Kate) is not stating exactly 'who' should be looking for Madeleine and by using the word 'someone' it implies that no-one is looking for her. Does that make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Really great post hobs. Top quality. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a comment